I do think ai in fileing a protest could extend hearings. 

We have to consider the form to clear off the issuees and look for inconsistency. Extra added by ai and not substantiated would cause us to doubt the evidence to the detriment of the protestor. 

I am all in favour of ai making sure a protest is valid, but really not more. 

It will not know the facts, just those needed to win 

Coaches books etc are sought and considered, and help edit or become concise. 

I see ai at the push of a button leading to lots of additional text. 

No i have not looked at the example but Will be doing so. 

Rule 89.2 provides the option to change the NoR provided adequate notice is given.

As brought out by John d Farris, any change needs to be communicated to all stakeholders.

I was responding to your question about QR codes.

John,
Thank you for providing the link to the article posted by Graeme Hayward and originally written by Mary Pera.  It is sad that neither of them are with us any more.  

I think I probably hint at it in my OP, but I think some of these shifts are fully appropriate, while others are maybe appropriate, even if potentially at odds with the phrasing in Case 103:

TLDR: