Skip to main content

The Racing Rules of Sailing

Handling multiple sail sizes as a single entrant in Club Racing, Regatta DIV — feedback wanted

Subscribe
John Anderson
Nationality: Australia
Certifications:
  • Club Race Officer
  • Regional Race Officer
 Do any of the major results packages (Sailwave, SailSys, etc.) support scoring a competitor who uses different sail sizes race-to-race as a single entrant, rather than creating a separate entrant per size? For example, the RS Aero has four rig/yardsticks in use (5, 6, 7, 9). We'd like sailors to register under one rig size (say Aero 7) but be free to down-size in heavy air, and still be scored as one continuous entrant. This keeps them sailing.
Proposed formula: adjusted time = raw elapsed time × (registered rig yardstick / rig sailed yardstick).
For example, if a sailor is registered on an Aero 7 but sails an Aero 6 on a given day: adjusted time = raw elapsed time × (Aero 7- yard-112.5 / Aero 6-yard -114.6 ). This converts their elapsed time into what it would likely have been on their registered rig, and that adjusted time is entered into the results package as their result for the race. Where we'd use this: club racing, where we actively encourage skippers to down-size in strong winds for safety and enjoyment — this removes any scoring penalty for doing so. We wouldn't use for a Regatta Calls DIV. There we'd follow the existing ILCA/RS Aero convention of treating a rig change as a new entrant, accepting the DNS/discard consequence for the original entry, rather than normalizing across rigs. However, we propose using it for: A mixed-yardstick DIV combining classes like ILCA, Finn, and RS Aero together when there are insufficient numbers to have separate Class Divs. Of course it requires manual adjustments of elapsed time, before entry into the results.  Keen to hear if anyone has tried something similar, or spots a flaw in the approach.
Created: Today 18:35

Comments

Format:
We do this with our club PHRF racing using SailWave. Don't see why it wouldn't work in a general sense. It is a PITA for the RC but the racers like it ....
Created: Today 18:57
Huw Pearce
Nationality: United Kingdom
Hi John,

Short answer is Sailwave can cope with the rig size changes you are asking about.

Sailwave is able to have a different rating for a competitor for each race. The race rating for the race in question can be manually set to the rating for the race appropriate to the rig size being used. It is also possible to import race results from a CSV file. Since Sailwave version 2.28.7, Sailwave can also import as part of a csv file the rating to be used for the race. See https://www.sailwave.com/how-do-i-import-a-list-of-race-results.

When publishing results from Sailwave you can also using an 'Effect', a piece of JavaScript code, to show in the overall series results the rating used in each individual race.

So using Sailwave there is no need for calculating an adjusted elapsed time before entering into Sailwave :-)

I hope the information is helpful.
Kind regards,
Huw
Created: Today 18:58
Eric Rimkus
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • National Race Officer
  • National Judge
Rig swapping has become a bit of a problem to deal with in some classes for OAs in both administration and cost. It also creates issues with results when boats move between classes and entry numbers change. Personally I don’t like what it does to results as races get re-scored with ghost entrants. 
For club events with a manageable number of total entrants why not just start all boats together and offer an “open” class where boats can use whatever rig they want?
It’s easy enough to move someone from “7” to “open” mid regatta and rescore all races in any of the scoring systems and you don’t end up with a bunch of DNC scores and boats registered multiple times (ghost entries). It also alleviates the RCs burden of determining, every single race, what rig a boat is sailing with. 

The idea of using a handicap in a OD class sort of flies in the face of why most people sail OD in the first place. If it’s what the fleet wants, great, but I suspect it will decrease instead of increase overall participation and satisfaction. 
Created: Today 19:04
Dan Bowman
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • Race Officer In Training
We do this with Sailwave as well.  The scoring is not the problem it is the awarding of trophies as often there are trophies for each class.  Generally we inform competitors that for high point scoring they will be scored as a different class for each rig/sail meaning there will be a number of DNCs for the races not sailed with one of the rig/sail combinations.  Turns out people have no issue with it.

Eventually the interest in over all results further diminished and now we have boats that sail spin/non-spin or different rigs and count as a single boat.  No one really cared and numbers  for boats on the water are good.  But this is going to be place specific.  Another club I belonged to would never permit the above.  I would support what ever the fleet wants, so long as they are sailing and happy with the results.
Created: Today 19:42
Leo Reise
Nationality: Canada
Certifications:
  • International Judge (Retired)
Just a dumb question - how is deciding to use a #6 instead of a #7 or #5 be any different than in large boat racing in deciding to reef, or use a #2 in a race?

If the class allows use of multiple sails during the event, why wouldn't you set up as registering to use a particular sail, eg #6, and base the handicap in it, allowing the boat to use a smaller sail but not a larger one, so all races would be based on a #6.

Makes life very simple 

Created: Today 20:28
Jim Champ
Nationality: United Kingdom
Reply to: 22390 - Leo Reise
Leo, I think the issue is that the small rigs with classes like the Aero and ILCA are uncompetitive on the full rig handicap even in pretty strong conditions. Its not like the Australian multiple rig skiff classes where their small rigs are genuinely faster round the track in breeze. So if a club insists on using the large rig handicap competitors who don't wish to go out with the big rig just won't enter the race.

As folk have said, Sailwave for one permits different handicaps in a series. At my club we go beyond rigs and permit sailors to compete with more than one class in a series. Plays merry hell when doing the PY returns to the RYA though.
Created: Today 21:53
John Anderson
Nationality: Australia
Certifications:
  • Regional Race Officer
  • Club Race Officer
Reply to: 22390 - Leo Reise
The potential difference is that it's hard to apply for reefing and sail changes made as swaps during a race. The Aero rig classes are fixed rigs for the entire race. It could work well for "Sorry Guys and Gals - No Spinnakers in the Twilight Series, please" when performance with and without spinnakers vary between classes.
Created: Today 21:56
Dan Bowman
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • Race Officer In Training
It's a good question.  Each sail is considered a separate class by the class association.  The SA/D of a boat with a different mast and sail behaves a little different and performs differently for the weight combination of crew and boat versus the sail/rig selection.  Permitting switching without costs like your suggestion would heavily favor light sailors.

You're idea makes sense and I like it.  Sailors of the smaller sail/rig combination may not agree.  It's something the local fleet must discuss.  In the ILCA class you are permitted to change sails in the Masters events but the Masters are very sailor friendly and kind to aging sailors.  In regular ILCA events you may not change sails as you are changing class which would be like changing to a different boat.
Created: Today 20:34
John Anderson
Nationality: Australia
Certifications:
  • Regional Race Officer
  • Club Race Officer
Reply to: 22391 - Dan Bowman
It's an old twist that someone downsizing from an RS Aero 9 to an RS Aero 6 in a 'blow' would often have a shorter elapsed time than for an Aero 9, because they avoid luffing, easing sail and heading away upwind, and capsizes on the gybes!!!
Created: Today 22:02
John Anderson
Nationality: Australia
Certifications:
  • Regional Race Officer
  • Club Race Officer
Reply to: 22391 - Dan Bowman
It's an odd twist that someone downsizing from an RS Aero 9 to an RS Aero 6 in a 'blow' would often have a shorter elapsed time than for an Aero 9, because they avoid luffing, easing sail and heading away upwind, and capsizes on the gybes!!!
Created: Today 22:03
Hi John,
As has been said Sailwave can handle the scoring.  Just need to get all the competitors to agree 
Have a look at the ILCA Demo results screenshot on this page https://www.sailwave.com/category/sailwave you will see in the results whenever the competitor is sailing a different rig to the registered the rig type is displayed with the result - Any questions please ask  - Jon (Sailwave Author)
Created: Today 22:33
You must be signed in to add a comment.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more