Hi everybody !!
I think that in position N°2 if we have contact and no demage,

1°)
Blue breaks rule 10 and

2°)
Red breaks:
a) BASIC PRINCIPLES "SPORTSMANSHIP AND THE RULES"

b) rule 2 and

c) rule 3.3a 
3.3 Acceptance of the rules includes agreement (a) to be governed by the rules; 


What do you think about it ?

Thanks you !!!

 I prefer using the current rule 69 instead of rule 2 because then you can give a warning if there appears to be misbehavior, especially if red is known be a non-Corinthian sailor around the race course.

Case 138
Rule 2, Fair Sailing Rule 69, Misconduct
Generally, an action by a competitor that directly affects the fairness of the competition or failing to take an appropriate penalty when the competitor is aware of breaking a rule, should be considered under rule 2. Any action, including a serious breach of rule 2 or any other rule, that the committee considers may be an act of misconduct should be considered under rule 69. 

 No change of course by red So blue had time to avoid. If there was surfing, blue should have allowed for that and avoided earlier

We are told no damage or injury so red is Exonerated for her breach of 14. It would be perverse to protest red  for a breach of 2 or 69 on the grounds that she deliberately broke 14 when she is exonerated for that breach

In light of the stricter standard of proof required for protests under 2 or 69 (beyond reasonable doubt rather than balance of probability) a finding against red is most unlikely. 

• The standard of proof for rule 69 is 'comfortable satisfaction'.  See Case 122.
• The standard of proof for rule 2 is, like every other rule except rule 69, balance of probabilities, but modified by the words of the rule " ... recognized principles of sportsmanship and fair play. A boat may be penalized under this rule only if it is clearly established that these principles have been violated."

The proposal that Red’s reputation should influence proceedings is wrong. Any protest must deal only with the incident in question. If there have been incidents in the past which were not protested, then they should have been. Gossip about non Corinthian behaviour is little different to shouting do your turns but not protesting.