Hi everybody.I'm not expert on Arbitration,and the foollwing puzzles me :
A protests B
At arbitration, B is given as the possible loser by the arbitrator; A refuse the arbitration.
B takes a Post-Race Penalty of 30% before the hearing, in order not to get a DSQ (T1(a),
At hearing, it comes out that A is the boat at fault, A DSQ.
Questions
1) does B Post-Race Penalty remain ? (my opinion: yes, but many time i get a surprise, so better ask)
2) if yes at firs question, being the Post-Race Penalty inducted by a Judge's opinion, is B entitled to redress ? (my opinion: no, but, again...)
Thanks
Unallowing Withdrawal of a Protest
Since that was a very long discussion and it may be difficult to find there the answer to Aldo's simple question, I am offering my opinion here.
B's post race penalty is an applicable penalty just like a 1 or 2 turns penalty taken on the water. And it may happen that a boat takes a 1 or 2 turns penalty "just in case" even when she's not 100% to be at fault.
So yes, the SCP from post-race penalty remains.
Let me also add that the arbitrator just offers an opinion and - as needed - a post-race scoring penalty. So it is an offer, not an imposition of a penalty, and it is ultimately the party decision whether to accept it or not.
This is just to clear any doubt that the offer from the arbitrator cannot even be grounds for a request for redress by B in case the panel should revert the arbitrator's opinion.
- Claudio
Both Appx T and USS's Appx V offer the ability for a post-race penalty and they are both offered with the following condition ..
After an Arbitration under Appx T .. the 3 of you are standing there like Clint Eastwood, Eli Wallach and Lee Van Cleef in the final scene of 'The Good, the Bad and the Ugly' .. waiting to see who will draw first.
Boat B draws first and accepts the post-race penalty ... but Boat A does not withdraw her protest and insists on a hearing. I think in that case, at that moment if Boat B would like to withdraw her acceptance of the post-race penalty BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF THE HEARING .. then fine.
Boat B would then be opening herself to a DSQ in the hearing and will no longer have the protection of 64.2(a)'s , " .. shall not be further penalized .. ".
I think that is Boat B's choice and Boat B's gamble to make.
PS: Which face below best fits the look on the face of the Arbitrator? :-) (I think Clint's got it)
But what a gamble for A to not withdraw her protest if B accepted the SCP.
She only has to lose, as B's penalty would not be turned into a DSQ anyway.
A may only gain one miserable point if B was before her in the race and gets a DSQ, what a deal!
When the man with a 45 meets the man with a rifle, you said, "the man with a pistol is a dead man."
C.
"B" can't be further penalized unless something special will come up.
And if the protest is not withdrawn the hearing will be held, it is up to the panel to decide which boat(if any) is penalized.